+1. So while places like my home would get lavished with projects, inevitably some of them a total waste, potentially valuable and useful projects in small states like Dana's would get axed. At least under the current system small states can compete for projects, even if it leads to idiot proposals like the "bridge to nowhere".
That is why I like tax cuts. Give the pols less money to screw around with. On 4/13/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In that case we agree. I was stating there would a focus problem should > we do away with the electoral college. > > And not only not visit, they would push projects to larger populations. > > This is part of a major problem with politicians if you ask me. More > worried about being elected, than serving the public. > > -- --------------- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:204223 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
