On 4/27/06, William Bowen wrote: > yes, yes he did. and since Bush was elected he bears sole > responsibility for what _is_ being done.
Well I'm pretty sure it turned out much better then the alternative would have. > > Since we're getting all retro I pondered the alternative. > > Which is simple speculation. A red herring, if you will (or even if > you won't). It has no bearing on what Bush is doing currently. Saying > something negative about the opposition doesn't serve to answer or > refute, it simply distracts. If you told me back in the day that you chose VHS over betamax and thought it was a bad decision because you didn't like VHS, I might want o point out that you actually did make a good decision. But I remember now, we're not allowed to mention the past unless it's anti-Bush. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205731 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
