I thought it said the FCC, and considering that portion was amended out before it was passed by the sub committee I'm not sure what the fuss is about.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Skorp Croze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 8:18 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Those that said it would not happen :Net Neutrality voted > down by congress. > > And revoking the "net neutrality" provision (requiring passing on > packets without regard to origin or destination), and turning such > decisions in the future over to the FTC (which, if you have been > paying any attention over the last 6 years, no longer even pretends to > not be in the hands of the large communications corporations) > > On 5/1/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here is the thing I don't understand. I haven't seen any law that will > > let them do this. No bill has talked about this specific thing. > > > > The last Bill Gel posted surrounded telcos selling cable service over > > IP. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:206024 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
