I meant that it contains news clips, not that it *is* one. I realized yesterday that we were talking at cross-purposes, and that this wwas probably due to inordinate terness on my part ;)
The bit with the President is a clip from a news show, yes? Now if I were to hear that the clip had been heavily edited, or actually referred to someone else, that would be a different story. I think my objection to "smear" is that it implies that there is something untrue being said. Personally, I think not, though I'll grant you that "stole Congress" is not exactly emotion-free language. I'm pretty burned out of the political threads here too... I think politics are important, but if nobody changes their mind or learns anything, what is the point? >I think that the word "smear" as Rob used it is also editorial in nature. > >I'm too burnt out on political crap to give a rats ass about what's in >the movie. I was just stating that it looks like it's being marketed >as an editorial documentary and not as a "news program". > >-Cameron > >On 5/15/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:206939 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
