Fine....someone who thinks this plan is working is not necessarily a
religious fundamentalist or an ignoramus.....they've just taken the facts
for this particular situation and drawn the wrong conclusion.


On 5/23/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought G Money was new.
>
> I'm sorry, let me re-state my point in a nicer way.
> Can you please not call people that thinks this plan is working
> religious fundamentalists, ignorant or both?
>
> Thanks,
> sam
>
>
> On 5/23/06, G Money wrote:
> > I've been G since the get-go.....moved my subscriber email address out
> to
> > GMail because the spam was getting overwhelming on my primary account.
> >
> > As for the kool-aid comment........HUH? I thought my conjecture was
> pretty
> > original. I've certainly never heard it posited before. If you disagree
> with
> > it, fine....but it's certainly not regurgitated rhetoric.
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:207359
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to