Suppression of opposition speech is a serious problem. Allowing a huge communications company like Clear Channel to determine who gets heard based on the artists political belief is a huge problem. Suggesting a discusson doesn't belong on this community because you don't consider it important is also a problem.
Once you shut up one person because of what they believe, regardless of their occupation, who decides who is silenced next? On 5/24/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/22/06, Skorp Croze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone else been following this story? > > > > The radio stations have decided that they don't want to play the Dixie > > Chicks. > > I think for me this falls under "who the f** cares". Anyone who sets > their political beliefs based on what some out of touch, living in a > bubble, movie star or musician says - has some serious problems. > > The country is sitting around wrining their hands over some mucis > artists comments and meanwhile real issues are being ignored. > Seriously, why is this even given airtime, or cf-community discussion > mindspace? > > -Cameron > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:207452 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
