Ah - good point. I was specifically talking about Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code. However, if you are willing to consider the Bible a work of fiction as well then I may see why religious folks are so upset over the Da Vinci Code.
-Cameron On 5/26/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the source for religious doctrine was anything OTHER than a fictional > book, it would be called science, not religion. > > So I'd say it's a perfect source for religious doctrine. It's the > requirement of faith that makes it a religion. > > On 5/25/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We are discussing quality of source. Hollywood isn't a quality source > > of political information (in general). Of course, a fictional book > > isn't a good source of religious doctrine either, but some people are > > having a hard time with that one too. > > > > -Cameron > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:207614 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
