I read a blurb the other day that said his environmental movie that just came out was intentionally filled with factually incorrect information. The rationale was that the misinformation was OK as long as it got the point across and made people aware of global warming.
Anyone see this and know if it's true? If so, i've got a bone ta pick with Al "Moore" Gore. On 6/1/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Heard Al Gore on an PR-XM interview a couple of days ago talking about > global warming and such. Was interestng and good stuff. We may > actually all be better off (long term) with him on his Global Warming > campaign than as president. Not because he would have been a bad > president, but because he's trying to positively impact human > civilization for the next few centuries, not for 4 (or 8) years. > > The site behind his campaign: > http://climatecrisis.org/ > > Pretty pictures, easy to read. Good stuff. > > -Cameron > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:207901 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
