> gMoney wrote:
> Those who shout ad-nauseum about our inevitable decline into a dictatorship,
> fascist oligarchy or rigid theocracy....are not.

Now you've departed from the point and are arguing style.  The
original questions are:

1.) Is this administration engaging in behaviour that's dangerous to
our system of democracy?
2.) If so, should we speak out? (be it to friends, the press, the
Congress, etc.)

My point was that yes, this administration is ignoring and actively
dismantling pieces of the American governmental system that ensures
democracy through checks and  balances and, yes, we should be speaking
out about it.

Your point seems to be on the style of the speech, rather than the
underlying content.

The irony of your "use the constructs of our system" point is that it
doesn't amount to much if those 'constructs' were just deconstructed
via executive order.  Which they have been.

For example, it's no longer inconceivable that the gov't could be
monitoring my emails and hold me in custody indefinitely without
access to a lawyer or family or the press.  And they could suspend my
rights simply because they don't like the content.  If that were to
happen, and the President has made sure that theyre's nothing
preventing it, where are the 'constructs' now?

So while you may think it's fantasy that the gov't could do this, the
President claims it isn't.  Thus the alarm.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208493
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to