The grand jury will never get a swing at indicting, since the special prosecutor declined to send charges against Rove to the grand jury.
He COULD probably get an indictment, but it is doubtful (based on his actions) that he could win a conviction. >From the outside without any real knowledge, I would bet that the tesimony Rove has given lately corrected some previous testimony, or fleshed out some earlier testimony, that made him less of a target. And that Fitzgerald is either done with him, or struck a deal to not charge him in exchange for further testimony. I think, thought that in this case, we WILL know some day what Fitzgerald was looking for. On 6/13/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd say there is some level of vindication, what is the old saying about > indicting a ham sandwich? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209091 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
