At the bottom of the yahoo story there's a comment from "Lawyer Kathi Pugh of Berkeley" who "was among those waiting for a flight. 'It just seems like they could figure out a better way to search people again rather than shut down the entire airport,' she said by phone from the crowded security area."
Strangely enough, even as technologically advanced as we are here in America, we still haven't invented a device that you can point at somebody and get an instant "terrorist" or "not a terrorist" reading. Poor lawyer lady, maybe she can file a class action lawsuit on behalf of all the inconvenienced *innocent* people. I travel fairly regularly for my job, mostly international to our Corporate offices in Paris, France. Even as inconvenient as it is to have to go through tightened security, I would still rather have a thorough check than the alternative; I'm quite of fond of breathing at the moment. I say unto this lady (and others of her ilk) I you don't want to be inconvenienced, don't fly. Don't have a choice? Get another job. But please SHUT THE F**K UP! Don't know why her comments are getting to me this way, just tired of the grousing, I guess... Rant expended, urge to kill subsiding... will ---- Advocating searching people at airports as many times as it takes to catch *ALL* the frigging terrorist bastards, for a better tomorrow ---- William H. Bowen Webmaster ALSTOM's Energy Management and Markets Business [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.esca.com/ > Maybe he stepped on a nitro pill...LOL > > Nice to see this new security working... > > At 09:19 AM 1/30/2002 -0800, you wrote: > >As of the local radio news report 1 minute ago (9:20am Pacific) it's still > >causing a big mess at SFO - United planes can't go to the gates, several > >thousand people will have to be re-screened through security. They weren't > >even allowing curbside drop off or pickup traffic to stop at the entire > >North Terminal where United domestic flights (and some other airlines) have > >gates. The international terminal isn't affected, nor the South Terminal, > >but United is the airport's largest tenant. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:18 AM > >To: CF-Community > >Subject: Another shoe bomber... > > > > > >http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20020130/ts/terminal_evacuated.html > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
