> Jerry wrote:
> How could you possibly construe these statements to be the same.
> I bet if you asked 100 people, you would be the only one to equate the two.
>

I took her point be that she took exception to any statement that
*may* imply even a majority elected Mr. Bush.

Her core point seems to be that despite the fact that a majority of
the population voted for Mr. Gore, due to an archaic electoral college
system, and not a few election irregularities, Bush was given the
election due to a conceding Mr. Gore.

Any statement that would remotely imply a majority or more voted for
Bush is offensive and, therefore, must be corrected.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209368
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to