Couldn't half be wrong and the other half be biased? > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:51 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? > > always *possible*, I suppose, but then so is rainfall in Albuquerque in > June ;) > > Seriously,if you dig into that article it says that multiple teams of > statisticians all arrived at the same conclusion. So either they are all > wrong or all biased. Personally, I don't think either of those is likely. > > >But couldn't it have been a bad statistical model? > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209644 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
