Now I have nothing to back this up but personally, I think it was the Democratic party who figured the Clinton's would be better back in office in 2008 than the likes of Kerry when he could have only won with a few votes against Bush who was already in deep waters. Then, the Democrats started pulling funding and rigging ballets left and right.
Now in 2008 Democratic party comes back strong with Huge turnouts and puts the republican party in the dirt for another 12 years, of which they pass legislation that allows an X-Prez to go for office again and yup, Clinton's win again... Shit, I even built a website for the campaign. SnowboardersforKerryEdwards.us ... Ha, didn't do much good. Casey On 6/19/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hmm. Don't have much time right now but the article seems to be saying > that Kennedy is wrong because he is contradicting the Democratic Party, and > besides, the last election was no more corrupt than the one before it. Um ;/ > > And even at that it's not saying the election was fair -- it isn't -- it's > just saying you can't prove it by Kennedy. > > > The Plains Dealer is Republican? Wow. > > > > Try this one: > > http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/06/03/kennedy/index_np.html > > > > > > On 6/19/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > > > um, a link from the local Republican paper... possibly worth reading > > if I could get past page 1 of the article, which essentially says > > don't worry be happy... > > > > > > ::shrug:: > > > > > > I don't worry, I am happy, and I am not convinced. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209763 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
