yeah, vitamin C? I don't see that working.
>I think the difference here is that the course of treatment that the parents >have selected is one that has very little scientific data to back it up, >where as the results of chemo, although not 100%, can be backed up with >numbers from studies. > >You are correct that parents decide to stop treatment everyday for their >kids with serious cancer, but honestly, Hodgkin's is a very survivable >cancer with conventional medicine, unless the disease was allowed to >progress to stage 3 or 4. If the parents decide to discontinue conventional >treatments the disease may progress to the point that even conventional >treatments are not going to help. Why take that risk? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:25 AM >To: CF-Community >Subject: Re: Schiavo II? > >This makes no sense. Every day parents decide to discontinue treatment >for kids with serious cancers. What makes this so different? Just the >fact that he's going with some alternate treatment option instead of >saying, "no more treatment, I'd prefer to just die?" > >On 7/13/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> A court has decided that his parents decision is equivalent to neglect >> and is ordering their son to get the court's recommended treatment. >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211109 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
