I was kind of confused on the same topic, but since I hadn't been over recent coverage in much detail I did not want to argue the point. This does seem to be a relatively balanced account of the matter, thanks.
>> Sam wrote: >> You claim this begins and ends with Novak. How is that >> possible? > >I stand partially corrected and will accept your offer of crow. After >a brief search I can see that things were much more more complicated >than I had understood - I humbly offer an apology. While I continue >to reject much of the rhetoric, damn does this get complicated quick. > >If anyone's interested: > >http://www.factcheck.org/article337.html > >Specific to this debate: > >May 6, 2003 ? A New York Times columnist writes the first account of >Wilson' s trip, but not naming him: "I'm told by a person involved in >the Niger caper that more than a year ago the vice president's office >asked for an investigation of the uranium deal, so a former U.S. >ambassador to Africa was dispatched to Niger . In February 2002, >according to someone present at the meetings, that envoy reported to >the C.I.A. and State Department that the information was unequivocally >wrong." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211246 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
