I beg to differ. It's not the constitution against moral values. They work hand in hand. The constitution protects life. The interpretation of when life starts or when it should be protected by the constitution is not an open and shut case.
On 7/21/06, Gruss Gott wrote: > Then you ask them to make a judgement - and that judgement should > never be based on "morality" of religion. It should be based on the > constitution and protection of liberty. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211609 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
