::shrug:: it was years ago, and really, the point is not my personal disruption 
but rather that this does not work for anyone, neither of the parents, nor the 
children it allegedly benefits. And it is a federal issue - it's a federal 
system. The court order is in Maryland but it does not disappear when somebody 
moves out of state. At the moment I am in New Mexico and he is in Virginia, but 
if I showed up asking for enforcement New Mexico would start generating 
paperwork and some equally fubar process would begin. 

As for Bush's position, well. You could do as well if you were willing to 
finance the focus groups, so that you knew what to say while doing nothing 
related to what you say.

Personally, I prefer the people who are actually trying to deal with the issues.


> > Dana wrote:
> > I had to write them several very haughty letters asking them to 
> please not help me any more
> 
> Well, that's kind of my motto with all government services, but I'm
> sorry you had to go through all of that.  I'm sure that the break-up
> and dealing with kids was enough without that.
> 
> That having been said, I'm not sure it's a federal issue.
> 
> >
> > You think this veto is really a matter of principle for him?
> 
> I dunno, and I'm sure you're right that, at least in majority, this 
> is
> a political decision.  However the logic is there and I'm having
> trouble finding any other position that has a matching cogent
> argument.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:211804
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to