What source is being protected here? This is footage of an act that occurred in public.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 10:43 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Blogger or Journalist > > Didn't happen to see that when I was googling this but it changes nothing. > If people start surrendering their notes/outtakes/whatever whenever the > prosecution wants to go on a fishing expedition, then pretty soon nobody > will talk off the record, and off the record sources are required for a > free > press. I don't condone arson attempted or not but the guy thinks he is > sticking up for a principle and he may be right. The exceptions to this > principle should be few and far between. Protecting Rove or Libby from the > consequences of their own actions might be a case for an exception. I am > not > sure that protecting an alleged federal interest in a police car that > allegedly might have been bought with federal funds really rises to the > same > level of seriousness. > > > On 8/2/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > IIRC whiteness claimed that a mattress was placed under the car and set > > on fire. It didn't take, but the intent was there. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212371 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
