Psst Sam

http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/?q=OTdlZGYzODgxODQxMzZhOTRkYTQzM2U2Mjg1Y2JjNjE
=

Dana


On 8/7/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Two or three weeks ago you attacked Rush and Coulter again saying they
> lied and mislead and that AC was a man. I pointed out that you were
> doing exactly what you accused them of doing but had nothing against
> them except your slanderous words. Now you're at it again. Blatant
> lies? Please for the hundredths time provide some examples. This vague
> charge you got from Al Frankin is bogus. Rush claimed most minimum
> wage earners are young and guess what?
> http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/wm1181.cfm#_ftnref5
>
> We know you don't like the guy but why do you have to attack him every
> day? At least find something he lied about first. And stop reading
> Wankit and daily kos, they're the ones that are lying to you, not
> Rush.
>
>
> On 8/7/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > > Dino wrote:
> > > I really fail to see how a commentator like Limbaugh is 'the worse'
> when he
> > > has a local reach and is really small scale in comparison to what's
> really
> > > being manipulated out there.
> > >
> >
> > I agree with most of what you said.  I guess I'm looking at
> > percentages.  Reuters is rarely a major news source for me, but I'm
> > guessing that most (90%) of their work is 'fair and balanced'.  Maybe
> > I'm wrong, but let's work with that.  And typically their workers have
> > some type of j-school ethics or did at some point.  At a minimum they
> > are faking pictures and knowing they are breaking ethics.
> >
> > With someone like Limbaugh, 90% is manipulated facts or outright lies.
> >  And he doesn't feel as if he's breaking ethics and has said so in
> > many interviews when he's been called out for it.
> >
> > One example in particular I can think of is when he threw out
> > statistics on the number of people getting minimum wage.  His stat was
> > triple the actual number.  He never retracted or admitted anything
> > because he was "a commentator, not a Journalist."
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212738
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to