I give the blog credit for the update. I don't remember the caption, to be honest. But why does the update make the blog reliable, and not the NYT? Not that I am especially defending the NYT; I think they are not very objective lately, but not, I think, for the same reasons as you.
On 8/10/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lets assume that the blog is not reliable. All we have to do is check > their > data to judge for ourselves. Is the guy alive in the first shots? Yes. If > he > shown laying down with his hat between his arm and body? Yes. Does the > caption totally imply that he's a dead body? I'd say so. > But the point is moot as the NYTimes just had to say "whoops, we really > meant he was hurt while helping" which absolves the editor who approved it > of any responsibility. > > Oh, on questioning the reliability of the blog, they did update it with > all > of the responses and additional information. That says responsible to me. > As > opposed to many media outlets who refuse or don't bother to do > retractions. > > > ok, I realize that you guys have already been at this for a couple of > > days, > > but how reliable is the blog, first of all? > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213049 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
