On 8/13/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There have been analysis of news headlines that have shown that when two > events happen,
It seems that both honestreporting.com and camera.com have a strong and admitted pro-Israeli stance. I cannot help but wonder how many errors they would find in the reporting regarding Palestine or Lebanon if they were not focused solely on finding bias against Israel. It's hard to find what you aren't looking for. > I'd love to know the types of other lists your on (not necessarily the names) > that feel that the media is pro-Israel. I'd also question their biases. My > biases are for facts, truth and balance. I don't see that in the media. Well, I don't see a lot of truth and balance in the media either, but I also don't see the level of bias either for or against Israel that would seem endemic based on what I read on some lists. Staged or doctored photos, poorly written headlines, sounds bites taken out of context, or given by someone who is totally without a clue as to the reality of the situation, anchors who ask questions about topics on which they are poorly informed, all of those are the shame of the media. Journalists in large numbers are uninformed and unprepared. But I just do not see a deliberate bias one way or the other. I don't think a liberal media is out to discredit Israel, and I don't think a Jewish controlled media is out of make of Israel the perfect victim. Incompetency, yes. A conspiracy of media bias. Nope. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213078 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
