> Sam wrote: > Chances are what they see is biased and they don't know > any better and/or don't care enough to dig deeper. The
Yes, those poor people. > I like his interpretation of > the event because he has a deep understanding of the background. Holy crap - did you just write that! Oh man, I love your posts ... Yes Rush's credentials in ... ok, surely his investigative ... well his years as a foreign ... oh yeah ... he's just a doped up sack of fat with really no expertise or history in anything. > > WSJ is a very boring paper to read everyday. Yes, for you I'm sure it is. > You always dismiss the editorial content I don't dismiss it, I disagree with it. Usually they end up coming around to my way of thinking but it just takes them longer. > Being a terrorist cheerleader Yeah but tossing and catching those hotties doing the splits all day makes cheerleading worthwhile. > Mathews is one of the most biased assholes on TV. Never seen his show, huh? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213222 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
