>> Dana wrote: >> issue is not what the technical capability is by any means. >> > >For me the interesting thing is that if this is upheld Bush will be >guilty of 30+ violations of a federal crime. For this reason I'm >guessing that they'll try to take this whole thing back under the >covers.
Probably not, it doesn't rise to the level of high crimes and misdemenors. Also unless the Democrats are able to take both the house and the senate this November, I rather doubt that the Republicans will go after Shrub. Hell, even if he were caught holding the smoking gun over Kerry's dead body, while sexually assaulting Hillary Clinton, he wouldn't be impeached by his rubber stamp Republicans. Moreover I am willing to bet that if it does come down to being charged with violating the law in this case, some Republican flunky will volunteer to fall on his sword and take the hit. > >They're already politically attacking the judge despite a very >thoughtful opinion. Of course its a typical tactic of the current Republican party. Never attack the message, smear the messenger. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213556 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
