apparently not. There is no way you could get "ignoring election laws" out of them. Go read tem instead of takig Rush's word for it.
On 8/18/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/18/06, Dana wrote: > > as many times as it fails to conform to the facts :) go look at the > original > > documents. > > I know what they say. > > > > > > > The Florida Court decided to IGNORE its election laws. The Federal > > > Supreme Court made them abide by the existing laws. How many times > > > does this have to be explained to you? > > > > ??? > > > Wow, unreasonable search is new law? > > > > One woman who's shown she doesn't feel the need to interpret the laws > > > but to make them. > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213631 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
