Moore added commentary that was not fact. Even Richard Clark said he ignored him and added lies to the so-called documentary.
So I have yet to hear an example of a lie. Not saying there aren't lies but I'd like to be informed. I heard Albright say she was not responsible for tipping of Pakistan before the bombing. The movie didn't claim she made the call, just that she knew about it and approved it. On 9/11/06, Gruss Gott wrote: > There's a big difference: Moore's film was shot documentary style - he > was showing actual facts. You can argue that he arranged them to make > a point, but what he showed were facts. (yes, yes, I've seen all of > the disputes and never seen any worth any amount of time) > > This is a re-creation with actors that purports to be a *historical* > recreation when it's not. > > Moore's was an arrangement of facts (thus no disclaimers), this is fraud. > > (btw - I in no way endorse nor support Moore or his film, just making the > point) > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:215159 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
