> poor accounting is one thing, but hiring people who are grossly
> under-qualified for the most ambitious foreign undertaking since the
> end of WWII is horribly irresponsible.

I agree, but doesn't the "poor accounting" follow the hiring of
incompetents? And FWIW "poor accounting" is awful damn nice to
describe the loss of BILLIONS of dollars of our money. Yes ours, the
American taxpayer. Callous disregard for the principles of basic
addition and subtraction.

I am glad that the administration is being taken to task over this. I
wonder though, if it will make any difference at all?

The problem here is that reporting of _anything_ negative--regardless
that the proof is in the HR records as in this case--still gets lumped
into the "liberal media bias" heading for far far too many people.

It is absolutely reprehesible that this administration has been given
an absolute pass on everything.

....and ready camera two on bush apologists in 3...2...1...

-- 
will

"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:215582
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to