Well.. that is some wear and tear...

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert B. Frobe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:47 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Say what?

which more than likely translates to, wear and tear not covered

On 9/28/06, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Limited lifetime warranty
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:08 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Say what?
>
> They have a warranty on them?
>
> On 9/28/06, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So.. is it common to replace rear brake pads at 7 months (12,000) miles?
> >
> > 2003 Tahoe.
> >
> > I got 54,000 miles off the original brakes, and both front and back were
> > replaced in Feb 2006.  Now, after getting a tire rotation this week,
they
> > tell me the rear brake pads have about 5% remaining.
> >
> > Sounds like to me they were never replaced to begin with...
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216355
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to