That's what I am saying. An illegal combatant isn't a war criminal.
They are an illegal combatant. Under the Geneva Convention they do not have the same rights as a legal uniformed combatant. However they are not always war criminals, which are generally reserved for serious crimes against humanity type issues. > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 8:49 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Republicans Suspend Habeas Corpus > > What international law are you talking about? > > I thought the Geneva Convention was the international law on the subject. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 7:51 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Republicans Suspend Habeas Corpus > > > > > > If KSM is a prisoner-of-war, then the Geneva Convention applies. If > > KSM is a war criminal, then international law applies. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:217804 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
