The whole argument results from the poorly-worded 22nd Amendment. It really should say that no person shall be allowed to serve more than two terms as President. I agree with the interpretation of intent in the law that the combination of the 12th and 22nd Amendments bars Clinton (or W for that matter) from running for the office of VP. If they are constitutionally ineligible to be President again (true), they can't run for VP.
On 10/20/06, Gruss wrote: > > The prospective presidential candidacy of Hillary Rodham Clinton has > given rise to plenty of speculation about the notion of Bill Clinton > as the nation's first gentleman. But what about another role? How > about, say, vice president? > > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/19/AR2006101901572.html -- --------------- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:218117 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
