Then you should prsecute them for illegal burning, and violation of clean-air laws, and breach of peace, and maybe "starting a riot", depending on if Tim is nearby or not.
On 10/20/06, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because as the emblem of our country it deserves protection from desecration. > I only support the defintion of purposeful burning of the flag outside of of > disposal ceremonies as desecration. That is an act, not speech. It is > associated with NON peacful demonstrations as the act of starting an open > fire in an inappropriate place is a breach of the peace. Because of the > breach of peace in the act, it is not afforded First Amendment protection in > my interpretation. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:218139 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
