On 10/27/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, not at all. > But Rush has been talking politics for 18 years and is pretty much a > pro at it. Doesn't mean you have to like him but he's got credential.
Yeowszers! Say it ain't so, Sam! He is so biased, I can't believe people could use him as a source of information. He does say funny stuff tho... > Olbermann was a sportscaster that is trying a new career as a Bush > basher. He's basically the worse case scenario for the opposite of > Rush. He bashes more than just Bush II.... and he's funny too! But I like Olbermann's "funnies" better than Limbaughs... Olbermann doesn't bash gays and stuff... And hasn't gotten in as much trouble as Rush. And Rush has gotten in a lot of trouble over the years... seems like every few months, he puts his foot in his mouth. But hey, I put my foot in my mouth too... Anyways, I'll go for some more middle of the road folks on PBS if I want "serious" pundits. I wonder, out of the two (just counting the time that Olb's been 'round) who has actually said more factually incorrect statements? But I bet the liberal media just doesn't focus on Olb like they do Limb. And statistics are the devil's plaything. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:218584 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
