I am generally against attacking anyone, but the Taliban left us
little choice. They may not *be* al-Qaeda but they actively allied
themselves with them and refused to cooperate in the extradition of a
war criminal.

Hussein on the other hand was anethema to al-Qaeda, far too entwined
with Western interests. Attacking him was forwarding some agenda other
than the safety of America. We are still there even though the head of
the government, elected in a vote we said was democratic, says we are
not welcome. So spare me the high-faluting rhetoric.

Dana

On 11/3/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taliban != al Qaeda
> Were you against attacking them?
>
> http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/006710.php
> The top secret letter 2205 of the Military Branch of Al Qadisya on
> 4/3/2001 announced by the top secret letter 246 from the Command of
> the military sector of Zi Kar on 8/3/2001 announced to us by the top
> secret letter 154 from the Command of Ali Military Division on
> 10/3/2001 we ask to provide that Division with the names of those who
> desire to volunteer for Suicide Mission to liberate Palestine and to
> strike American Interests and according what is shown below to please
> review and inform us.
>
>
> On 11/3/06, Dana wrote:
> > ::shrug:: Don't yell at me. I am just the messenger here. I do however
> > think that people in other countries have a point.
> >
> > Look at you, poster boy for unexamined neoconservatism. Saddam != al
> > Qaeda, Sam. No matter how much Kool Aid you drink.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219519
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to