>The documents are proof that Saddam, had the French gotten their way, would >almost certainly have an atomic weapon by now. If that isn't proof that we >did the right thing, I don't know what is. > >And BTW: > >http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2436948,00.html > >This is just [EMAIL PROTECTED] great. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] Euros go soft on >Iran and now >everyone wants to grow up and be a nuclear badass. WTF!!!! > >
Except for one thing. This is the second time this issue has come out. When the documents were originally posted on the internet, the same concerns were raised. As it turned out the so-called plans had been on the web for years, and the Iraqi government had simply downloaded the document. Some big revelation. It seems like a lame attempt to bring up an old issue as a way of influencing the election. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219553 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
