Helicopters for sure. I'm not sure how the chemical weapons were delivered, by aircraft or artillery.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 9:47 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Hussein's Conviction > > Hatton > > I appreciate your willingness to serve. However I wasn't talking about > the UN's perception (or mine). > > I was talking about Iraq's. > > And just as a quick reality check.... did Saddam even *use* airplanes > in attacking Dujail? > > Dana > > On 11/5/06, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/5/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 11/5/06, Jeff Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Iran wasn't attacking us. They still aren't. Iraq, on the other > hand, was > > > > in violation of international sanctions and was firing at our airmen > > > > enforcing the no fly zone. > > > hmm. I wonder if they considered that to be self-defense? I don't > > > know, but calling that an attack is a stretch imho. > > > > Nope, not even the UN called it self defense. We were there to keep > > Hussein from launching more agressive attacks against his citizens, as > > he had done the last time they tried to rebel against him. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_no-fly_zones > > > > I participated in the enforcement of the zones. The rules of > > engagement were very strict and typically required the lock-on of > > enemy (Iraqi) radar sites before agressive activity could be taken. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219673 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
