and there they are. Just out of curiosity does anyone remember where this concept came from that we should not discuss certain aspect of public affairs lest they affect an election? Is it only because the republicans are in power that I keep hearing that?
On 11/15/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is so last week. > > http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MzgxYzUzYmRlNjhmNzMyNjI2MDM4YmRjNTFhODA4MGQ= > > > On 11/15/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A forthcoming issue of Vanity Fair includes a series of interviews > > with leading neoconservatives about the Iraq war. Some of the most > > damning comments were conveniently released a few days before the > > election. > > > > Richard Perle, a former head of the Defence Policy Board (DPB), says > > that a "total defeat" in Iraqan American withdrawal, leaving a failed > > stateis becoming more likely, though it is not yet inevitable. He > > blames Mr Bush and his dysfunctional administration, and says that, if > > he could have his time over again, he would not have supported the > > war. > > > > Eliot Cohen, a member of the DPB, says that America could end up > > "drifting" to "some sort of withdrawal on some sort of timetable". > > Kenneth Adelman, who predicted that the Iraq war would be a cakewalk, > > blames the difficulties there on one of the "most incompetent" > > national security teams of the post-war era. > > > > http://economist.com/world/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8138336 > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:220764 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
