Duane, you said "You might want to verify this but a salesman at a local store 
mentioned that gaming on a plasma tv shortens its life. In my case the plasma 
as way more expensive than the lcd I was looking at ..."

I've gamed on just about all the HDTV formats and you just can't beat plasma if 
you're into fast action. Chess and other slow strategy games run fine on LCD 
flat screens, but scenarios requiring super speed really suffer from LCD's 
inherently slow screen refresh rates. Because plasma paints a picture on 
phosphors rather than lighting up pixels one at a time, there is no refresh 
rate time lag. I've also never heard that the life expectancy of plasmas, or 
any other screen types, is affected by the content of the programming -- games, 
movies, football, slide shows -- they're all a series of electical zeros and 
ones to any digital display, the set really doesn't know (and if it did, it 
probably wouldn't care) whether you're playing a game, watching the morning 
farm report or wondering what stupid thing was going to happen next on 
Desperate Housewives.

I am very puzzled about your remark on pricing. Are you sure you weren't 
looking a rear-projection LCD set? Like DLP models, those are basically entry 
level HDTV receivers generally priced lower than plasmas. Flat-panel LCDs 
however, largely because of the high failure rate and consequent huge warranty 
costs, are almost always much more expensive than same-size plasmas. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:220992
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to