well I found the link and no they do not assert ownership, though publishing through them means it can show up in a search, which seems fair enough.
As to my other question, I *think* it implies that there is no issue until I publish, so using it to markup copyright materials should be ok, but I would not mind a second opinion (at all) if someone feels up to plowing through some legalese. http://www.google.com/google-d-s/terms.html On 11/24/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wondering if there is anyone out there who has read the terms of > use. I know yahoo at one point was asserting ownership of materials > posted on its servers. > > Also, I am wondering if there are issues involving copywrited material > made into documents for one's own use. Suppose I take a Washington > Post or ars technica article (say) and highlight it and put sticky > notes on it and insert marginalia and the like -- as long as I do not > publish the document this should be ok right? > > Dana > > -- > The more you find out about the world, the more opportunities there > are to laugh at it. > Bill Nye, Interview with Wired.com, April 2005 > US TV host and Science Guy > -- The more you find out about the world, the more opportunities there are to laugh at it. Bill Nye, Interview with Wired.com, April 2005 US TV host and Science Guy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:221244 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
