> gMoney wrote: > Many do not like him because they don't feel he correctly represents the > interest of the United States. Our interest should be dialogue and diplomacy > at this point, which don't seem to be his strong suits. >
Exactly. And as far as what he's delivered, from what I'm hearing that's a big zero. "He's pushed for ..." is not delivered. So by what metrics is anyone considering him effective? Just that he's shown up and yelled a lot? That's not effective. Results are effective and he seems to have few of those, if any. Now in his defense we might say that he's not yet had time to deliver results and therefore be effective. The counter to that however is that his style no longer represents the intent of the voters: bi-partisan dialogue and diplomacy. And he resigned, he wasn't kicked out. Likely because he understood that he no longer had the support of the US government, no longer represented its methodology, and would not be able to be effective. In short, he decided that the new Congress would not like his methodology and would, therefore, eject him. Rather than adapt, he chose to leave. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:221788 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
