Why? Overdose levels for THC or Marijuana are extremely high. Research shows 
that the LD-50 levels (where the dosage is so high that 50% of the sample dies) 
is so high as not to practically possible to test for Marijuana (for rats we're 
talking about 20% of the body mass). Also physical addiction is very difficult 
to measure for Marijuana, it simply is not there. Psychological addiction on 
the other hand is possible. So I don't think that the addiction possibilities 
should be considered.

>Also.. if you overdose or require medical care because of your addiction to
>marijuana:
>
>You must pay for all medical treatment, including emergency care, out of
>pocket and up front.  No tax payer flipping for the bill and excluded on all
>health insurance coverages.
>
>Should be the same for alcohol and cigarette smoking in my opinion...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:13 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Marijuana legalization Was Re: Is this a political oxymororn?
>
>The easy way to legalize: 
>
>Legalize pot with these caveats
>
>1) it must be in a packaged form (ie: pre rolled cigarettes)
>2) it must be sold in the same way that alchohol is, with special state 
>required licensing or in state owned stores
>3) a measure of "proof" like alchohol must be established (THC by volume?)
>4) it must be taxed like alchohol
>5) can only be sold to those over 21 years of age.
>6) "grow your own" laws similar to home brewing statutes (200 gal/per year 
>max)
>
>This gives the cigarette manufacturers something to sell when tobacco is 
>banned, it's a huge new tax source, and it's regulated.
>
>
> 
>
>Scott A. Stewart
>REAC/PASS-IT
>(202)-475-8875
>
>
>
>
>"Bruce Sorge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>01/10/2007 02:37 PM
>Please respond to cf-community
>
> 
>        To:     CF-Community <[email protected]>
>        cc:     (bcc: Scott A. Stewart/REAC/HHQ/HUD)
>        Subject:        Re: Is this a political oxymororn?
>
>
>Well put. I recall the three trips I took to Amsterdam in the 80's that
>there was not a lot of criminal activity going on. And I did not see 
>stoned
>Dutch men and women (or tourists for that matter) roaming the streets
>causing trouble. Sure there were some folks sitting around in the parks or
>whatever toking on a joint, but most of the drug use there was done in the
>bars where they were sold. And even then, those folks were pretty much
>sampling the things they wanted to buy. Even cruising around the town at
>night I did not see anthing that would have scared me away or make me not
>want to go back. As we all know drugs are legal in Holland and have been 
>for
>some time. Maybe they are on to something?
>
>Bruce
>
>
>On 1/10/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Legalized drugs would be cheaper, no doubt, but they would also become 
>the
>> province of big corporations rather than "mom and pop" drug dealers.
>> Legalization would open up more research into the benefits and hazards 
>of
>> specific drugs and might actually lead to some useful scientific
>> knowledge.
>>
>> The situation we have today with illegal drugs is exactly the situation 
>we
>> had with alcohol during prohibition. Since the products can't be sold
>> legally, they become the province of gangsters and thugs who both drive 
>up
>possession
>> of small amounts are the first steps in a generational shift in 
>attitudes
>> about drugs usage- treating drug use (and abuse) as a public health
>> problem
>> rather than a criminal one, just as we have done with alcohol.
>>
>> The latest studies show that teenagers are using fewer illegal drugs, 
>but
>> at
>> the same time they are using (and abusing) legal prescription drugs at a
>> much higher rate than in the past. We need to get over the legal/illegal
>> distinction and treat the entirety of drug use as a public health 
>problem,
>that
>in

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:224270
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to