I would, personally, rather fall back on perl, foxpro, c++, c, director, even assembler.
Not because of the language itself, but mainly for the types of projects and the types of people that come along with .net work. On 1/25/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have to agree with you Robert. After having .NET shoved down my throat > from a previous employer who bought into the whole Microsquash Marketing > Monster and totally abandoning CF, I have discovered that there are a LOT > more opportunities for me. For years I have relied on CF to get me work, > but > sad as it is to say, .NET seems to be in much higher demand than CF. I do > like a some of the features that .NET 2.0 has to offer and in some > instances > it makes the job a lot easier. But writing in C# or VB.NET to get the job > done takes so long. As many who know CF and .NET can attest, you can do a > lot of the same things in CF with far less coding than you can in .NET. > But > if we are to remain marketable, we have to go with the market. I will > still > seek out CF gigs first and foremost, but when the times get lean I can > always fall back on .NET. > > Bruce Sorge > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225727 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
