** Private ** wrote: > We do not yet know the evidence that was used to convict him. > > If the police did not follow up on the previous rape (remember when that > used to happen a lot - that police thought rape was the woman's fault?), and > it can be proved they acted in bad faith, then I think he may have a case.
The police destroyed evidence in an open case. Evidence that, in my interpretation of the information, pointed to someone else. And that in hindsight pointed to the guy that confessed three years ago. I don't know if he has a case, but I think he should have. > But, as the article pointed out, no one has the right to a perfect > investigation. The far more interesting quote is "You have to show more than negligence.". How bad does it have to get before you have a case? Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225801 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
