You're comparing someone claiming oral sex is not sex to someone repeating what the first congress stated back in 1789? Hello.
On 1/27/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course the irony is that many in same party that were appalled at > Pres Clinton's ridiculous detailed parsing of his own language over a > BJ are NOT appalled at Gonzo's ridiculous parsing of the Constitution. > > Thus many in the Republican party seem to be implicitly offended at BJ > defense, but have no offense at blatant attacks on the Constitution. > > That about sums up Neo-cons. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225999 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
