more right wing tabloids. According to the wikipedia article, your man also says second-hand smoke is good for you... so I dunno why I *would* read the entire 10-part series...
Articles on canada.com have been the worst kind of populist vitriol when I've looked at them at your behest in the past. On 2/4/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/3/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > you can't refute their proceedings by quoting the new york sun? > > The NY Sun article was written by: > > Mr. Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the > University of Virginia and former director of the U.S. Weather > Satellite Service, is the author with Dennis Avery of "Unstoppable > Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years." > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Singer > During Operation Desert Storm in 1991, Singer debated Carl Sagan on > the impact of the Kuwaiti petroleum fires on the ABC News program > Nightline. Sagan said the smoke would loft into the upper atmosphere, > disrupt the monsoons and lead to ecological disaster. Singer said such > a view was ridiculous, that the smoke would go up only a few thousand > feet and then be washed out of the atmosphere by rain. Three days > later, black rain began falling over Iran, which essentially put an > end to the speculation > > http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200702/CUL20070202a.html > > .... Some climate researchers and environmental scientists previously > associated with the IPCC claim the public relations summary of the > panel's fourth assessment report distorts the actual scientific > findings and that the discrepancies are driven by a political agenda. > > .... The IPCC Summary for Policymakers, roughly 20 pages long, is > primarily the work of political appointees, not of scientists, > according to Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric science at MIT. > > .... "These people are openly declaring that they are going to commit > scientific misconduct that will be paid for by the United Nations," > Harvard University physicist Lubos Motl wrote on his website last > week. > > > http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=156df7e6-d490-41c9-8b1f-106fef8763c6&k=0 > Read the whole 10 part series. > > Dr. Shariv's digging led him to the surprising discovery that there is > no concrete evidence -- only speculation -- that man-made greenhouse > gases cause global warming. Even research from the Intergovernmental > Panel on Climate Change-- the United Nations agency that heads the > worldwide effort to combat global warming -- is bereft of anything > here inspiring confidence. In fact, according to the IPCC's own > findings, man's role is so uncertain that there is a strong > possibility that we have been cooling, not warming, the Earth. > Unfortunately, our tools are too crude to reveal what man's effect has > been in the past, let alone predict how much warming or cooling we > might cause in the future. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226758 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
