Delete key works wonders.

On 2/6/07, So Kenfused <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Over the years , from time to time (is that redundant, not that I really
> care. If it really bothers you report it to your 8th grade English
> teacher, he/she will be glad you retained something ) the subject of
> Spam comes across this list.  It is my understanding that Michael has
> gone to great lengths to protect us from Spam.  Thank you Michael and
> Judith for allowing him the time away from family for such trivial
> pursuits (no tm, and thankfully none of the oh so gaining in popularity
> content linking advertising crapola).
>
> However,  every now and then someone finds a way to circumvent Michaels
> efforts.  BFD we get a few spam messages coming through. Deal With It.
>
> A while back the founder of this list ( I got tired of using Michael in
> every other sentence) modified the display so that it no longer
> displayed our email addresses for the evil Spam Masters to harvest.
> Kudos (crap can't even use Kudos with sounding like Rush Blowhard (hi
> Sam). Something else high-jacked from general use by an extremist. Thank
> you Mr. Jessie Jackson and the gay community (not necessarily related)
> for high-jacking the Rainbow) to aforementioned founder herein to be
> referenced as the List God or LG for short!  (Go back and read that last
> sentence without the parenthesis if you want it to make sense.
>
> So with all the complaining about Spam and all the efforts of LG to
> protect us from it (as if we don't already get 500 freaking spams a day,
> so what difference will 6 more make?) Why in the F*&^*^ do some of you
> find it necessary to include my email address in your responses to
> posts???  It really is ok to reference a name or a moniker or just quote
> the damn post.  See examples:
>
> Example 1:
> Do you think I care about your opinion?
>
> >bob
> >rants suck
>
> That is an acceptable manner of responding to Bob's post of "rant's suck".
>
> Example 2:
> Do you think I care about your opinion?
>
> "rant's suck"
>
> No reference to individual who posted "rant's suck", but the response is
> understood because quoting the original post provides context. Again, no
> email address required.
>
> Example 3:
> Bob, do you really think I care about your opinion of my rant?
>
> No reference to original post, so this methodology can be a little
> harder to follow but still somewhat acceptable.
>
> Example 4:
> do you really think I care about your opinion?
>
> rant's suck
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What the hell is the purpose of including Bob's email address?  Why not
> just add his address into the Master Spammer's ultimate list of email
> addresses (now available on a three disc set for $49.95)
>
> Or you can be a little more creative and write a snippet of code that
> seeks out registration forms and register his email address with every
> registration form online.
>
> Who's the Fing_Tard who puts my email in his response.  I have a stash
> of last years muffins right here.  Did you see the Rock, Paper, Scissors
> commercial during the Toilet  Bowl.   Yeah, you better duck pinhead.
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227005
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to