On 2/20/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Same here. Too bad, because I like Edwards....before he started taking his > stance on issues :) > > See that's the problem, once you start talking on concrete issues, you give > people something real to base their opinions on.....which can be favorable > or unfavorable. It's why everyone else plays the politics game....makes it > harder to outright dismiss them before the election. > > I'll still like John Edwards, but like Gruss, could never give him my vote.
+1 It *is* refreshing to hear something other than, "That's an important issue for me... if elected I'll work hard to make sure it is resolved." That kind of answer without answering is what drives me mad. You never know where the candidate stands until they take action... after they're elected of course. I listen to a show based in Dallas where the host constantly makes this comment: "I don't *want* bipartisan! I want my guy to stand up and tell me what he stands for and FIGHT for it. I want the other guy to tell me what he stands for and FIGHT for it too... and whoever is elected WINS." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:228410 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
