I'm really glad we have Sam to clarify what is relevant to a grand jury investigation and what isn't.
Excuse me sir that question doesn't appear to be relevant to the investigation at hand can I get a mulligan on this question. I mean it's really not convenient to answer it (kind of an inconvenient truth that I'd rather not talk about) and I might indict some of my buddies so it's cool if I LIE on this question isn't it? Sam wrote: > On 3/7/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Just putting the severity if the lie in perspective to the case. >>> >> so, a little lie is okay, and a big lie is bad. >> > > The question is did the lie have anything to do with the case? > > >> Or perhaps a little lie is not okay "I did not have sexual relations >> with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." >> > > Shows a pattern of behavior, has a direct impact on the Paula Jones case. > > >> And a big lie is okay "Iraq *has* Weapons of Mass Destruction." >> > > Let's leave Clinton out of this. > > >> I guess it depends upon your POV. >> >> Of course, in the eyes of the law, lying to the Feds is supposed to be >> verboten. >> > > So why did Russert and Miller do it? Why did all the prosecution witness do it > > >> Unless, of course, it's your guy. Then it's okay, as long as the lie >> is small. I think. Is that right? >> > > Did he out Plame? If not then it's irrelevant to the case. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:229666 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
