Same level of scrutiny? Me too. In fact, I hope Bush gets more scrutiny than Clinton. I hope he gets it 10 times worse.
And no, it is not a scandal brewing. These were thieves, liars, and cheaters. The DNC is littered of these kinds of people, and so is American business. It happens. Unfortunately. I wouldn't call that an article as much as a hit piece. Michael Moore is a slimy guy. As to the accusations, I say bring them on. If Bush turns out to be the sinister evil guy Moore implies that he is, then he should go. If you can show me one crime he has committed while in office or campaigning, or one thing he's done that was improper, I will be the first to say he should go. Heck, I'm one who thinks that just the "appearance of impropriety" should be enough to cause one NOT to do something. I'm not being easier on Bush than on Clinton. I'm a libertarian and think both parties suck. There just hasn't been the damning evidence against George W. that there was against Clinton. And I don't think Bush is anywhere near the scum sucking pig that Bill is. Now, where was Moore when Clinton was embarrassing us all? > -----Original Message----- > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:36 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > > > How about Bush trying to deny he even knew Ken Lay? Please, this > is a scandal brewing and I just hope Bush faces the same level of > scrutiny that Clinton faced. Here's an interesting article: > > http://www.michaelmoore.com/2002_0129.html ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
