Your initial point was: "You simply cannot deny the fact that if 60% of the National Guard is in Iraq.....<hello>they</hello> aint here."
And I did deny it. Now your NEW point is about the equipment. Bunting: "We have got plenty of soldiers and airmen here, but we would be short on equipment. And we would be forced to go to other states, through the Emergency Management Assistance Process, to get the equipment in here." Isn't that's why it's called the National Guard as opposed to the State Guard? It would be nice if we didn't have any wars and we had all the equipment we could image we might need, but that's not the case. On 5/10/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let me apologize for not being clearer. Now that that is over, please > respond to the direct quote from the head of the Kansas National Guard that > basically spells out my initial point....we are underprepared for multiple > disaster responses in Kansas. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe® Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7. Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:234439 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
