On 5/14/07, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Check Syria? > > Okay. > > .... > > Done. Hate the food, no good TV and no WMDs.
You're good. Quick too. > So we invaded to stop a madman from getting wealthy? > > Which argument are we on? Defense, humanitarian or social change? Cute, but you said there wasn't much threat because of the sanctions. I was just pointing out that they failed. Not only didn't they contain the threat but also they probably caused hundreds of thousands of deaths because the food and medicine intended for the needy was used to buy away the sanctions. > > I don't see many American terrorists. Are you talking about the school > > shooting? > > The second largest terrorist attack on American soil? The Oklahoma city > bombing? Hundreds dead? Remember that? You said "most" and that was just one. > Not "weak" - weaker. As in "we're weaker for having invaded Iraq". Or are we stronger for fighting this new age war? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2 Build sales & marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade now http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2?sdid=RVJT Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:234675 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
